Sīrija

[hobbit_lv]

Pajautāju AI, kāds ir likumīgs pamats ASV bruņoto spēku klātbūtnei Sīrijā. Lūk, ko AI man atbildēja:

The legal ground of US troops being on the ground in Syria right now is a matter of debate and controversy. The US government has argued that its military presence in Syria is authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which grants the president the power to use force against those responsible for the 9/11 attacks and their associated forces. The US also claims that it is acting in self-defense and in defense of its allies, such as Iraq and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), against the threats posed by the Islamic State group (IS) and Iran-backed militias.

However, these arguments have been challenged by many legal experts, international organizations, and other countries. They point out that the 2001 AUMF does not cover IS, which did not exist at the time and has no connection to al-Qaida or the 9/11 attacks. They also argue that the US has not obtained the consent of the Syrian government, which is the legitimate authority of the country, nor a UN Security Council resolution, which is required for any intervention that does not meet the criteria of self-defense or collective defense under international law. Moreover, they contend that the US is violating the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria, as well as the human rights of its people, by conducting military operations without regard for civilian casualties or humanitarian consequences.

Therefore, the legal ground of US troops in Syria is very weak and questionable. The US has been accused of acting unilaterally and illegally in Syria, without a clear strategy or end goal. Many observers have called on the US to withdraw its forces from Syria and respect its sovereignty and political process.